21 de abril de 2014
Architecture cannot embrace this unrealistic and sometimes fake idea of material chastity. the solution lays in the production of effective processees that are much more biological, this is, that are in harmony with its environment or that have engage in some sort of biomomicry. This also concerns materials and the understanding that not all processes are material. This requires a much more comprehensive understanding of the systems in which we are as living creatures embedded in.
This also has to do with a new conception of fuel or the idea of energy. It is delusory, in my opinion, the idea of sustainability, but nevertheless that doesn't mean we cant move towards an achievement of some sort of innovation or progress, which cannot mean un any case material progress.
We need to demystify technology and promote a depolarized attitude towards substance. The contemporary panorama its confusing but not necessarily chaotic. This means that as subjects we ned to acknowledge the escalating complexity of our environment, which requires new systems of navigation and communication. Is to my opinion as well, that we are at a time of connectedness rather than of autonomous solidity. Its is therefore necessary that although we remain disciplinary/professionally circumscribed, we have a set of systems in the collaborative practices or interdisciplinarity.
For this effect we need to unlearn this solidity and start melting our brains in a process of unfolding criticality. It is true and possibly innegable that reason has its limitations, but still an inquisitive attitude should pervade.
It is hopefully a trigger rather than a totalizing view of nature that I can convey with these wounds.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario