Campo obligatorio; no debe dejarse en blanco.

Architecture as a self-contained profession that deals with the conception and definition of the material.

In this process of conception and definition it liaises with the fields of cultural phenomena that might influence a priori or a posteriori the definition of the specific forms, this is to be decided by the architect, who chooses between isolation or exposure. Danger lies in becoming completely oblivious to reality or to reproduce reality. Where does criticality lie then? I think this is the conflict which I hope to elucidate. Obviously lets think of an in between, or a gradation. But how do we put this into practice? It is for me urgent to practice and to study at the same time. Action research embedded into practice? How can we inject this criticality into the realm of direct actin/involvement? Is the answer in the social sciences? Is the answer in philosophy? In phsyclogy? In psycoanalyisi? In short, is the answer in interdisciplinary practice? if so, towards what? resistance? resistance to what?... and so on and so forth.