Campo obligatorio; no debe dejarse en blanco.

I'd rather say theres a lack of political engagement in our current society, meaning western developed countries, than people need to be more engaged in politics in, say, the UK.

We can teach content to our fellow colleagues, but they will come back hungry. Instead we need to share a will to learn, rather than being educated. This production of autonomous/inter-dependent agencies need to happen, somehow, so people can position or (dis)locate themselves.

We might acknowledge the existence of a capitalist society, of a consumerist society, of a socialist society...But we can't deny the interdependency of things, i.e. welfare estate liaising with the rise of capitalism, socialism with a political agenda, etc.

Rather if we wish to challenge the status quo, and not because we automatically do, or because we want to personify the so-appraised avant-garde, but because our thinking, and not of less importance, our feelings, tell us that something is wrong, i.e. a miserable face in between a glory of wealth.


If, yes, we are to acknowledge that we can live in society, we might want to strive for equality, or at least for opportunity, and not only the chance to success, but the chance to diversity of choice as well.
Philosophers think because the heart told them to do so, not because they wanted to prove reality.


"Imagination is more important than knowledge"(Albert Einstein) and for so we have come to think of the limits of our own reason, leaving room for a world of perception. Leave them alone since all they have been searching is for a world full of love.



With no more delay,

oxoxoxox, hoping that the will of your hand has a say, has a space of its own in a world of [fabricated] misery.